Thursday, May 22, 2008

The Quality of Mercy

The Thought For The Day:
I don't do drugs anymore... I find I get the same effect just standing up fast.



I received a letter I'd like to share with you:

Dear Bubba,

I’m writing to you as a last resort. I am an enigma, a formula to be more precise, and I’ve enticed and enchanted mathematical theorists for centuries. You have the most wonderful readership known to man, and I’m hoping there’s someone among them capable of understanding me. I guess I really shouldn’t complain, I’ve gotten lots and lots of attention over the years, but sometimes it seems that no one understands me, at least not in a deep and abiding way.

I’m the equation xn + yn = zn, where n represents a whole number greater than two. That’s it... as theorems go, I’m really pretty simple, but I have no solution. That’s me in a nutshell, but for some reason, men are fascinated by me and no one, no matter how hard they might try, can come up with my solution. It’s depressing...

Like any beautiful woman, I attracted some men who only wanted to fool around with me a little before moving on. They manipulated me in un-Godly ways and forced me to commit perverse acts of atrocity just so they could chart my curves and revel in my many provocative undulations on or about the x-y axis. Take that bastard, Yarosh, for example, who went out of his way to prove me for n=2. Do you have any idea how that made me feel? It was so incredibly degrading. Would you want to be proven for just n=2 and nothing else?

At first, I thought Euler was different from all the others. He spent every waking moment thinking only of me... and I held such great hopes for the future. But, alas, it was not to be; he failed to understand me like all the others.

And don't bring up that tired old argument about Andrew Wiles, either. He’s the worst of them all. Sure, in 1994, he proved me, like that’s the end-all of end-alls... he walks in, manipulates me and gets lucky. Slam, bam, thank you, ma’am... but that's not the same thing as understanding me, as truly knowing what makes me tick. Did he once, in his 20-year obsession, ask me what kind of music I liked? Or inquire as to my favorite scent? No.

In the final analysis, he used that easy Taniyama-Shimura conjecture to get to me—I was reduced to becoming the product of an Oriental gang-bang! That hurt. It reduced a big part of me to a semi-stable case and I thought I had, for all time, lost my identity. In all his years of fondling me (and never to completion), the only time he ever spoke directly to me was late at night when he'd been working too hard, and he was depressed and embarrassed by allowing his Japanese buddies to share me.

Screw Andrew Wiles and everyone who looks like him! I haven’t heard from him for nearly ten years now, and I hope I never do again. More than likely, he’s off solving three-body problems using only odd numbers, if you get my gist... he’s into that sort of group thing.

Bubba, if people care about you, they don’t need proof. They can find out all about you by merely trusting their feelings and communicating. I have lots and lots of experience with mathematicians, and late at night, when I’m really most vulnerable, is when they are at their worst. They’ll tell you anything. They say they want to understand you, but it’s really only the thrill of the hunt... the conquest. They never stop to ask me HOW I can be understood. It’s then I want to scream at them, “Hey! Put down that calculator and just talk to me! I’ll tell you anything you want to know if only you’ll think about ME for a change!”

Maybe that’s how they all are. They use their fanciful explanations, always dancing around the true essence, but they never really get to know you. Okay, I admit, I’m not the easiest theorem in the world. There... I said it, are you happy now? But I hardly think I’m impossible! At one time, no one could prove the Pythagorean Theorem, either... nowadays, nine-year-olds understand his entire essence. Maybe it’s our age difference, I don’t know... he’s a very old theorem.

I just know I can't give up hope. However, I also know I can't rely on imaginary numbers to make me complete, either. That's just not the kind of theorem I am. Deep down, I have some really complex variables. There may be no solution for me for whole numbers greater than two, but I've learned to live with that. All I need is one, just one person who truly understands me, and I'll finally consider myself a complete, happy, balanced equation.

Bubba, do you know anyone who can complete me? I’m not asking that he be rich or good-looking, or even smart, for that matter... I just want to find a quiet, unassuming mathematician (please, no engineers) who holds the key to my future happiness. I’m begging you, please help me.

Waiting,

Fermat’s Last Theorem

Folks, I don't ask for much... could one of you please answer this cry for help? You could possibly save a life this morning. Honestly, I think she's desperate. Look into your heart and sharpen your pencil... you can do it, I know you can.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh the poor dear! Has she tried any three's lately? Sorry, I'm not good at math. :( {{{FLT}}}

paisley said...

dude... i failed fractions... huh uh,,, nope not me...

R.L. Bourges said...

I could keep it simple and answer nothing has changed since Fermat said : "Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet." But this theorem likes to complicate things. To tell the truth, bubba, don't let word get around but I think she ah...fools around with the integers when nobody's looking, y'know? The poor mathematician comes back to the problem and -lord god of the Conjecture! - the integers don't...y'know?

I've suspected Fermat's Final Theorem of obfuscation from day one. Probably a personality disorder of some kind. Drives everybody nuts.

kaylee said...

This is way to much information
for me to think about.

I shall be back after everyone
has commented and steal
someones post and pretend
it is mine,
and then laugh about it,
love

kay lee

Anonymous said...

I'm with Kay Lee! I mean, this is the girl who only passed college algebra (after the third try) because she memorized the quadratic formula to the tune of "Pop Goes the Weasel"....

Wait for me, Kay Lee!

;)

Bubba said...

Nan-- I'm going to have to insist that you define: {{{FLT}}} I just spent the better part of twenty minutes staring at my monitor going through permutations, with no success whatsoever. Fess up!

Paisley-- Not to worry, it's entirely possible that many of my readers don't have advance math degrees, and I've never asked a single one of them to stop commenting. You are welcome here.

Lee-- You would seem to be the exception to the possibility I furthered in the comment posted immediately above this one. As you so eruditiously point out in Fermat's own original latin, that he had a truly marvelous proof of the proposition (the Arithmetica of Diophantus), in which this margin is too narrow to contain. The problem, however, is not that she fools around with integers, it's that her solvers *only* fool around with integers, leaving her uncompleted and unsatisfied... poor thing.

It would seem that there might be some validity in your assertion that Fermat's Theorem contains didactic elements tending to obfuscate an already muddled and murky resultant, but to immediately leap onto the personality disorder bandwagon would assume facts not in evidence, at least not as judged from a seventeenth century perspective. I venture to say he had access to no Prozac, so I choose to be charitable as to his situational dynamics, but that's just me...

Kaylee-- I love your comments *because* of their simplicity, rather than vice versa. Just keep stopping by and heaping me with praise and we'll always stay friends. *snort*

Karen-- Yezzzz... I seem to recall some of those discussions, back in the day. *double snort* Hee hee!

Scot said...

hweh s syhsh hasj kjsiun

Anonymous said...

***I'm going to have to insist that you define: {{{FLT}}}***


Du-uuuuude!!!!!!! a name enclosed in brackets is being cyber-hugged. the signer of the letter you shared with us CLEARLY needed a hug. Now go figure it out. ::telephone head emoticon::

Bubba said...

Nan-- Of course! 'Duhhhhh' would seem to be the only adequate (verb?) to expostulate my distress regarding my fat-headed inability to discern your meaning. Thanks for the explanation... and the hugs. I'll be sure to pass them along to FLT. (And I appreciate the 'telephone-head' reference, too... *that* really takes me back.)

Scot-- Need me to come over and sit with you awhile? Maybe call the doc? There, there... it's gonna be okay... shhhhhh... Uncle Bubba will make all the bad voices go away... shhhhhhhh.

Anonymous said...

Hey Bubba, if I were you I just wouldn't write back! Even though I'm sure you have the answer...just let her wonder!

Anonymous said...

Haha, awesome. This reminds me of a calculus joke on a shirt I saw once: "Baby I wish I was a derivative so I could lie tangental to your curves."

Anonymous said...

Hello
lexapro sale
You can have Lexapro but need to wait for 2 weeks before starting your regimen of Lexapro and once you stop taking Lexapro, you need to wait for 2 weeks before taking MAOI.
[url=http://www.piecethemusical.com/]buy lexapro online[/url]

FDA has approved Lexapro, an antidepressant drug to treat major depressive episodes, panic disorders with or without agoraphobia, social anxiety disorders and generalized anxiety related disorders in adults.
http://www.piecethemusical.com/ - order lexapro

FDA has approved Lexapro, an antidepressant drug to treat major depressive episodes, panic disorders with or without agoraphobia, social anxiety disorders and generalized anxiety related disorders in adults.

Anonymous said...

merci beacoup - http://www.achetersildenafil.net/ achat viagra sans ordonnance